Currently viewing the category: "Editorial"

Editor:
It was interesting to read your article ‘Redefining Energy’ in your November edition. It paints a wonderful picture of a responsible industry striving to evolve and make peace with those its work impacts. But, of course, we know that’s a bunch of BS.
Let’s face it: For decades the oil and gas industry has run rampant over landowners, with the tacit agreement of the governments involved. They like the money they get from this industry too much to make much of an effort to curtail it, or to make it operate more responsibly.
Politicians worry that if they make things too difficult for the industry, the big corporations will pull out and go to work elsewhere in the world, where the climate is more friendly. Then what would we be left with, the politicos worry. Ranching in Alberta at a time when that industry is on its heels? Forestry in BC, when that industry is almost non-existent? They don’t dare kill the goose that lays the golden egg.
So the landowners are left to fight this battle on their own. And that is truly a David and Goliath scenario. Imagine the farm or ranch couple faced with a land agent explaining there will soon be drilling on their property, or a pipeline running across it, or both. What happened to the concept of ownership? What other industry can come onto your property whenever and however they wish, just because they think there’s something there that they want? None.
And let’s not even think of the impact of this industry on our water supplies, especially now that the search for unconventional gas in shale and silt formations has taken the process of ‘fraccing’ to new levels. Many areas suffered drought conditions last summer and some communities had to impose water restrictions on their citizens. Did we hear of the big corporations cutting back on their fraccing so they wouldn’t use so much water and thus help us out? Not a chance. Is this a responsible industry?
It’s fine to talk of the progress being made in the industry, and likely that’s what energy conferences like the one in Fort St. John BC are for. But the BC Premier, the mayor of Fort St. John and the others quoted in the article are deluding themselves if they thing problems are being solved. The industry is just making polite noises to stall those upset with its operations and its lack of simple human decency while it pursues the almighty dollar at the expense of everyone it comes into contact with. The money a Shell or Encana spends on so-called advancements is only pennies to them, but it’s a great smoke and mirrors game to fool us into thinking they really care.
Aaron Gottlieb
Grande Prairie

 

Editor:
I was surprised to read Karen’s article (The Toybox) in the Nov. issue of NWB titled Calling All Gamers.
The reason I say surprised is that my impression of NWB’s target audience is that it is partially the businesses within the region.
If the above is true, most business owners that I know are not gamers.  Many don’t have time or are enjoying a lifestyle that is a nice one, but gaming is rarely included.  My knowledge of the business market may be limited but perhaps the above is true.  The article certainly had very little relevance to me.
The other aspect that is well known to people working in the technology industry is that Microsoft has released more software and solution for businesses that are in NWB target audience in 2010 than at any other time in the company’s history.
IBM, Cisco, HP and Google are also releasing products that are more and more relevant to the SMB market in the near future and have released several over the last two years.
It is a time of very rapid innovation and change for businesses that are connected to technology in any way.  Perhaps content highlighting the technology or the local impact it has had may be more of interest.
If you would like article suggestions going forward I have several and would be happy to offer any suggestions or content that you feel might be relevant.
Darren Boyer,
Via email

 

Editor:
The letter to the editor ‘Seeking Equality’ was not ethical for you to publish. It’s racist. Basically some old guy ranting on a sensitive topic that has no bearing on what your magazine deals with on regular basis. I’m shocked you published it.
If you would like any other racist material, I don’t like Italian people. Let me know.
Jesse Fehr,
Via email

 

BC politicians have had a rough go of it lately. First of all there was all the foofurah about the HST and the official government intransigence, which led to the resignation of Blair Lekstrom as Minister of Energy and Mines. Then, low and behold, Premier Gordon Campbell was shoved from his lofty perch (even if he says it was his intent to step down). And now Lekstrom’s replacement Bill Bennett has been summarily dismissed for – well that depends on who you are.
Independent thinking is an expected and valued part of being a northerner. There is a sort of perverse pride in going against the grain and it seems that Bennett could fit right in here. While there are those that are offended by his outspoken criticism of Campbell’s opting to stay in office in the face of public opinion that would leave the nearly dead running for a place to hide – there are many who are not.
Maybe there is something in the water up here (and once is all it takes) that creates a special kind of backbone. Two energy ministers, two outspoken and independent thinkers, two men left out of a portfolio where they belong only to be replaced by Natural Resources Operations Minister Steve Thompson (Kelowna-Mission MLA).
Even juggling a position created in the recent government restructuring, a position that isn’t all that clearly defined, could be a plateful even if the rest of the provincial government was stable. In this situation, adding these new responsibilities is a bit like handing the baby a cactus to play with.
Our resources are too important to let hurt feelings or unbending arrogance dictate who takes the lead in guiding us through the next few years. At the end of the day, party solidarity is meaningless if it doesn’t support the people who bring in the dollars – and in this case, whether that’s what we’ve been handed is questionable at best – no offence to Minister Thompson.
Alienating one minister from cabinet and ousting another to save face in a situation where there is no face left to save is an insult to thinking people everywhere and Campbell continues to make decisions backed by the puppet cabinet at the public’s expense.
And all this instability could likely inhibit the growth of this region’s oil and gas industry at a time when it’s just crawling out of a recession. Ok, so Bennett and Lekstrom may not be the best of team players. Good on them. Ok, so Bennett and Lekstrom are branded “mavericks”. Good on them.
It’s easier to fight it out with someone who tells it like it is than someone whose opinions are buried beneath layers of rhetoric anyway.
Good thing cabinet can’t fire everyone that has a voice.

 

Like our children, it sustains us in a myriad of ways. It also challenges us as only the things we’re intensely passionate about can. It’s something more than our livelihood, our playground and our legacy.

Literally, the land is our life. As we live, so does the land.

Competing interests, however, continue to make the forward strides in environmental responsibility, industrial accountability and the practice of good stewardship look like baby steps.

We’re spoiled in many ways. The expanses of empty land have offered unprecedented room for everyone, but even here, the 21st Century encroaches. As that happens, the rights and needs of the various stakeholders clash more frequently.

There are never easy answers to the push and pull of industrial, agricultural and traditional land use in the moment, never mind into the future. The region has struggled to make sure that all stakeholders have a voice in how land is managed from the extraction of subsurface resources to a reasonable and equitable use of water.

It still takes the Wisdom of Solomon to know how to split the baby – and as more people compete for the same land, more pieces to split it into.

With all parties holding equally legitimate concerns and uses, all of which go into supporting the region’s economy and quality of life in their own way, even Solomon might struggle for the right solution.

The various factions need to stay in close contact with each other. Perhaps more importantly, remembering the whole is more than the sum of its parts will mean, as it did in Solomon’s story, that everyone doesn’t end up with useless parts of something that was once a miracle.

Click here to get in touch with the Editor